Boeing 787 Dreamliner Project-Free-Samples-Myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Critically Evaluate the Boeing 787 Dreamliner Project. Answer: Introduction Boeing commercial Airplanes with an aim of delivering the companys most fuel efficient airliner, undertook a project to develop Boeing 787 dreamliner jet airliner using composite materials for construction work. The most striking features of this airliner are the four-panel windshield, noise reducing chevrons and a smooth nose contour. These features helped the 787 dreamliner become worlds fastest selling wide body airliner with a huge number of orders (Wagner and Norris 2009). However, the project suffered many hurdles due to improper execution and inefficient implementation. The project problems and the project management problems of Boeing 787 dreamliner jet are elaborated in the following paragraphs. The project Problems The major problem identified in the said project are listed below- Boeing aimed at trimming excess weight of the airliner; however, the first aircraft was overweight by 5000lb or 2300kg. This is mainly due to the inefficiency in developing a proper structure of the airliner. This resulted in the considerable delay. The project suffered multiple delays because of the procurement, sub assembly and major technical problems that were identified in the later stages of development (Denning 2013). Another major delay resulted when the completed airliner could not pass the testing phase. An in flight fire on the Rolls Royce engine of the aircraft was identified during the testing phase, which added to the considerable delay in the product launching. The project suffered the problems of over budget due to the poor performance in following the project objectives. The organizations suffered billions of penalty fees to the airlines. Further problems were identified in November 2011 when the 787 dreamliner experienced problem in its landing gear. The pilot had to deploy the gear manually for ensuring a safe landing when the automated system did not engage. This was because of the improper testing procedures and lack of thorough testing that reflects an inefficient project management problem. After the release of the developed aircraft, it started suffering from problems in the electrical system within one year. The major problem was with the lithium ion batteries. The maintenance crew discovered smoke coming out from the main battery 2 hours prior to the take off. The fault was identified in the power pack and its charger. The company without trying to find the root cause behind the problem quickly came out with a solution. In order to deal with this problem, the company encased the battery within a heavy steel box and included an exhaustion pipe for the smoke (Williard, Hendricks and Pecht 2013). This revised design was however approved by FAA and the dreamliner was again back by the end of April in the year 2014. This problem was mainly encountered because the less critical evaluation of certain conditions involved with the project. The project needed a thorough research before its execution (Nolan 2012). Furthermore, the project suffered a new problem in June 2014, which was mainly the result of the change in manufacturing process. The manufacturing of the airliner did not include shims in the connection of wind rib and wing panes. This resulted in creating hairline cracks in the wings, which could enlarge and cause further damage in the wings. The aircraft suffered certain software glitches as well that needs to be upgraded to address the problem. All this problems depicts a clear case of inefficient project management with an improper planning, developing and testing phases. The project if managed better could have saved the company from considerable over budget and time loss. Critical Evaluation on managing the Boeing 787 Dreamliner project The 787-dreamliner project could have been managed more successfully if proper project management methods were considered. The major characteristics of a project are to have a well defined objective and proper planning of project elements such as time cost and performance requirements. A project life cycle generally deals with four broad phases, initiation, planning, execution and closure (Kerzner 2013). Had the organization properly executed all these stages, it could have saved itself from the incurred losses. The project could have been executed and managed more successfully with the implementation of certain condition that are listed below- The project under discussion had no clear strategy. Every project has to be clearly linked with a proper strategy for its successful implementation. Strategic management is also necessary for allocating the scarce resources that improves the competitive position of the firm. The organization clearly lacked strong links among the mission, goals and objectives for a proper strategic implementation of the project. Furthermore, the strategic management process ensures the identification of strategic gaps in the project, which was clearly missing in the said project. Had these criteria considered, the project could have been managed better (Larson and Gray 2013). Another problem that was identified with the planning phase of the project was that it did not have any long-range goals and objectives. This resulted in the identification of the problems at the later stages of the development, which further lead to the design change of the whole system (Burke 2013). This project could have been managed better if there was a concrete plan for proper execution of the project and a clear objective. The company aimed trimming the excess weight of the aircraft but ended up in developing a heavier airliner. This could have been avoided by setting up a clear plan and objective for the project. The project could have been managed better by developing a project priority system prior to the execution of the project. This prevents the possibility of implementation gap and resource conflicts in a project. Moreover, a portfolio management was necessary for estimating the NVP of the project and the cost benefit analysis. This could have saved the company from over budget. Project portfolio balances the risks involved in the project and helps in prioritizing the project proposal according to the criteria of the project. This could have further helped in efficient project management. Risk management is very necessary to be considered in any project. The company did not have any proper risk management plan that result the company in incurring huge losses. Risk management deals with identifying, analyzing and eliminating the risk associated with a project (McNeil, Frey and Embrechts 2015). The company did not estimate or consider the technical or the software glitches that the aircraft might experience. Thorough testing was necessary to identify the glitches in the system and in order to deal with the identified problems, a proper risk management plan was essential. This could have helped the company in managing the project in a better way. Conclusion Therefore, from the above discussion, it can be summarized that the project 787 Dreamliner suffered multiple laybacks in its project execution due to an inefficient and improper project management strategy. The project design was improper and execution lacked proper planning. This resulted in sufficient loss of the company and successive delays in delivering the completed project. Different problems related to the project management were identified. The project lacked important components of project management and hence the project suffered considerable delays and revision. The report critically evaluates the strategies that could have been implemented by the company for a successful project management. References Burke, R., 2013. Project management: planning and control techniques.New Jersey, USA. Denning, S., 2013. What went wrong at Boeing.Strategy Leadership,41(3), pp.36-41. Kerzner, H., 2013.Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley Sons. Larson, E.W. and Gray, C., 2013.Project Management: The Managerial Process with MS Project. McGraw-Hill. McNeil, A.J., Frey, R. and Embrechts, P., 2015.Quantitative risk management: Concepts, techniques and tools. Princeton university press. Nolan, R.L., 2012. Ubiquitous IT: The case of the Boeing 787 and implications for strategic IT research.The Journal of Strategic Information Systems,21(2), pp.91-102. Wagner, M. and Norris, G., 2009.Boeing 787 dreamliner. Zenith Press. Williard, N., He, W., Hendricks, C. and Pecht, M., 2013. Lessons learned from the 787 dreamliner issue on lithium-ion battery reliability.Energies,6(9), pp.4682-4695